Experimental integration · not in any release

Mneme HQ + NVIDIA OpenShell

NVIDIA OpenShell runs an AI agent inside a sandbox and controls what the agent can reach: files, processes, network destinations. Mneme is an open-source tool that stores a team’s architectural decisions in the repository and checks code changes against them, either inside a coding agent before it writes a file or in CI on a pull request. A Mneme integration with OpenShell is experimental: a controlled experiment ran, but no adapter or install step is released.

Status: experimental

A controlled experiment ran in October 2026. OpenCode, an open-source terminal coding agent, ran inside an OpenShell sandbox, and a Mneme plugin checked what OpenCode’s write tool was about to write to a file. The setup pinned OpenShell 0.1.5, OpenCode 1.19.3 and mneme-hq 0.10.0.

A draft specification in Mneme’s open-source repository records the results and lists the tests a maintained version would have to pass. With the Mneme plugin active, a write that would have added the forbidden library psycopg2 to the file was blocked. The experiment checked the whole file, not only the changed lines, while Mneme’s shipped hooks check only the lines a change adds. A compliant write was saved, and the resulting code ran. When OpenCode ran with all of its external plugins turned off, Mneme’s included, the same forbidden content was written.

The same document records what did not work. An import written in a dynamic form was allowed, because the rule matches literal text: a coverage gap. A change that named the library only in documentation was wrongly blocked. The wider benchmark of 14 tests was inconclusive, and the run that showed the block used a different model from the one that benchmark fixed. Records from some earlier runs are missing, and one planned test was not run. The document supports no claim that every write is checked or that the check cannot be bypassed.

A second draft adds a reference integration to the roadmap: an optional example setup that Mneme would maintain, separate from OpenShell itself. Both pull requests contain documentation only, and neither is merged. The experiment code is not public.

Experimental, not released. The reference integration is proposed in a draft specification, not merged or released: no release of mneme-hq, Mneme’s Python package, includes OpenShell support. Its scope is OpenCode’s write tool only. Other OpenCode tools, shell commands and OpenShell’s own settings are outside it. Not for production use.

What OpenShell controls

On October 21, 2026, NVIDIA announced the OpenShell Reference Architecture. It pairs the open-source OpenShell runtime with NVIDIA hardware, including optional NVIDIA Sentry (not Sentry.io, the error-monitoring service). The runtime does not need that hardware. NVIDIA’s technical walkthrough describes four parts:

A sandbox policy is a YAML file. In the v0.1.5 documentation, the default version on October 22, 2026, it sets readable and writable paths, the user that sandbox processes run as, which destinations each program may reach, and middleware for allowed traffic. The file and process settings are fixed when the sandbox starts; the network settings can change while it runs. Outbound traffic is denied unless a rule allows it.

The prover documentation says it uses a satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) solver, a tool that proves logical statements, and that a pass does not mean a policy is safe for a particular task or that a running sandbox enforces it.

What OpenShell does not decide

Say a sandbox lets the agent write under src/handlers/. Your team has decided that request handlers reach the database only through the approved storage adapter. The agent adds a handler that imports the database driver directly. Every OpenShell control passes: the path is writable and no network rule is involved. The violation is in the content of the file, and OpenShell’s policy model does not read file content.

QuestionWhat answers it
Can this process write to that path or reach that host?OpenShell sandbox policy and supervisor
Does this policy grant more than our boundary allows?OpenShell policy prover
Does this code change respect a decision the team made?Mneme, where it can see the change: a hook in a coding agent that Mneme supports, or CI

Mneme does not enforce infrastructure policy and is not a sandbox.

Where the two could connect

OpenShell documents several extension points. Each sees a different slice of what an agent does, and none sees every file write.

PointWhat it seesMneme status
The agent’s own file-write toolThe exact content about to be written. This is where the experimental OpenCode write check sits.Experimental
Gateway interceptorsChanges to OpenShell itself, such as creating a sandbox or updating its configuration, and only operations on an allowlist that OpenShell’s gateway maintains. Operators choose which of those operations to intercept. Before a change is saved, a validate call can allow or deny it and a modify_operation call can rewrite it. A post_commit call only observes. The documentation describes only these gateway operations, not the agent’s file writes.Research: no adapter
Supervisor middlewareHTTP and WebSocket traffic that the network policy already allowed. It can inspect, change or deny it.Research: no adapter
Security event logsSandbox events in the Open Cybersecurity Schema Framework (OCSF) v1.8.0 format, exportable as JSON to a security monitoring system.Research: no mapping to Mneme evidence
CI on the pull requestThe final diff, outside the sandbox.Shipped, independent of OpenShell

What you can use today

You can run the CI check today. It runs on the pull request, outside any sandbox, so it does not depend on where the agent ran. In strict mode, the default, a violation exits with code 2 and fails the job; in warn mode it is reported without failing.

Mneme also ships hooks for some coding agents, such as Claude Code and Codex CLI. A hook is a point where Mneme inspects a file write before it happens. Whether these hooks work inside an OpenShell sandbox has not been tested.

What would have to be proven

Before the status could move past experimental, a fixed version of OpenShell and a fixed version of Mneme would have to show:

FAQ

Is there a Mneme connector for OpenShell I can install?
No. A controlled experiment ran, but the integration is not merged or released. Its proposed scope is one OpenCode file-write tool inside an OpenShell sandbox, and the experiment found a coverage gap.
Does Mneme replace OpenShell policies?
No. OpenShell controls what an agent can access. Mneme checks code changes against recorded architectural decisions.
Does OpenShell include NVIDIA Sentry?
No. NVIDIA Sentry is an optional hardware layer in NVIDIA’s reference architecture. The OpenShell runtime works without it.
Would an OpenShell integration also cover Open Policy Agent (OPA) or NVIDIA Sentry?
No. Each is a separate system with its own interfaces, and each would need its own proof. See Open Policy Agent and NVIDIA Sentry.

Related reading

Continue

Use what ships today

OpenShell support is experimental and not released. Mneme’s shipped checks run in supported coding agents and in CI.

Prefer MCP?

Mneme also exposes its Decision Index through a standard MCP server for interoperable access from compatible tools.

Explore MCP →